Those of us who have led or participated in classic strategic planning processes are familiar with crafting a mission, clarifying the overarching vision, doing a SWOT analysis, setting targets and goals, and identifying key stakeholders who will shape or be impacted by the plan.
Seems like a fairly essential and straightforward process. Virtually any group or organization worth its salt has such a plan, for-profit and non-profit alike.
So why do so many seem to fail? Or why do they sit in the 3-ring binder on the shelf? What do so many do so little with something that took so much work and created so much synergy?
Here are some questions to think about as you diagnose your experience with planning.
Do we shape the plan or does the plan shape us? Seems like the plan becomes the master not the tool. Rigid planning that focuses just on hitting numbers soon becomes a taskmaster that stifles creativity. Everyone bows down to worship the plan. “Well, I suppose we need to do this…after all it’s in the plan from 2009.”
Did we follow the dictum, “CLARITY FIRST!” or did we race to have a plan? Are we really clear about our mission and vision? Do we really know what we are becoming and striving for? Most groups and teams create a “Vision Statement” or “Mission Statement” so they have something to hang on the wall, put on a golf shirt or stencil on a coffee mug. But it often lacks clarity and rarely reflects the soul of the organization.
Are we leading by passion or vision? Organizations led simply by passion – what’s hot, new, trendy, urgent, cool – actually become stagnant in the long run. Every month or year it’s a new cause, more hype, tacky slogans, and more change that does not line up with the core vision. Employees, volunteers, clients all get weary and vote with their feet. I was part of such an organization and the last 7 years I was there it lost vision, continues to have no clarity, and leaders and followers alike are dropping like flies. We replaced vision casting with passion casting.
Are we thinking beyond ourselves? Ram Charan, a Dallas-based consultant to many successful organizations, encourages groups to ask themselves these 6 questions in the article “Sharpening Your Business Acumen”:
- What is happening in the world today?
- What does it mean for others?
- What does it mean for us?
- What would have to happen first (for the results we want to occur)?
- What do we have to do to play a role?
- What do we do next?
In your organization, church, or team, take some time to reflect on these questions. The world is changing and, more than ever, leaders are called to think beyond themselves and the immediate needs of their organizations.
It’s time to move beyond passion casting on the one hand, and rigid planning on the other. It is time for fresh, flexible thinking guided by core convictions and clear, collaborative action—in the same direction together.
Now that’s a plan.
Ministry & Non-Profit Services
Business Services
Leadership Development
Books & Resources
#1 by Stephen Blandino on December 1, 2011 - 9:08 pm
Quote
Bill, these are great questions. It’s interesting that when we don’t have “clarity first” it seems easier to let passion hijack vision. A fuzzy vision always lacks conviction and therefore it’s easier to let the tail wag the dog. Your comment that vision and mission statements often don’t reflect the soul of the organization is very true in local churches. About a year ago I was talking with a church planter who was crystal clear about what he didn’t want his church to be. But he wasn’t so clear about what he did want his church to be. I cautioned him, “You can’t build a church on what you don’t want the church to be.” The substance of vision is “will do” not “won’t do.” Gaining clarity often takes more time than what leaders anticipate…but it’s worth the time and energy to get real clarity and to let that clarity produce the passion. Thanks for the post. Great thoughts!
#2 by Bill Donahue on January 6, 2012 - 9:09 am
Quote
I love your comments about not focusing on what you don’t want! Great insights!
Bill